Skip to main content

Table 1 Echocardiographic Findings Following Conduction System Pacing Across Published Studies

From: Echocardiographic imaging in patients with conduction system pacing

First author

Year

Pacing types

No of patients

Non-echocardiographic parameter

Follow-up after proce dure

LVEF

GLS

Dyssynchronyand different chocardiographic parameters

Cheng [31]

2024

LBBP, LBFP

and LVSP

QRS < 120 and EF ≥ 50%

56 (18, 16, 22 respectively)

QRS, LVAT

6 months

EF ≥ 50% (average above 60%)—no significant changes in follow-up

no changes between the groups in the follow-up

GCS, GRS

PSD—no differences between the groups;

lead tip depth in the septum and lead tip distance from the tricuspid annulus and apex

Pujol-López [23]

2024

CSP vs BiVP

ON and OFF programming

70

 

6 and 12 months

increased in both groups

- improved in both groups

In both groups:

PSD decrease

LVESV decrease

Septal flash disappearance

septal rebound disappearance

LBBB strain pattern disappearance

Tian [29]

2024

LBBAP

65

NT-proBNP, QRS,

6 months

increased

for RV and LV improved

LVEF

RV and LV GLS

LVEDD decrease

LVESD decrease

significant MR decrease

3D RVEF

LV and RV dyssynchrony decrease

Boczar [10]

2023

CRT (BiVP) + HBP

21

QRS

1–2 days

Increased

Improved

LVEDD

LVESD

LVSV

MR grade

LA strain

Bednarek [28]

2023

LBBAP

151

QRS, NTproBNP

Median 23 months, min 1 month

Increased if LVEF < 50%

improved if LVEF < 50%

LA strain

Dell’Era [21]

2023

LBBAP

56

QRS

Implantation, < 24 h and 3 months

Increased

worsened

PSD decrease

IVMD decrease

Michalik [20]

2021

HBP vs RVP

50

QRS

1 day, 6 months

Not measured

Stable

RVP PSD and LAVI increased

HBP PSD and LAVI decreased

Sun [26]

2020

LBBP vs RVP

32

 

Before and after implant

No difference

No difference

2D-TD PSS (18 segments) and

2D-SD PSS (18 segments) shorter under

LBBP than under RVP

Tang [32]

2019

HBP vs RVAP

62

 

1, 3 and 6 months

Not measured

Not measured

3D-TD

3D-SD

Mei [33]

2023

LBBAP, RVSP, RVAP

90

NTproBNP, QRS

before and 4 weeks

no changes

GLS best in LBBAP, worst in RVAP

GLS

SDI—the shortest in LBBAP

Longitudinal and circumferential Tε-dif—the shortest in LBBAP

(3D) TMSV 16-SD—the shortest in LBBAP

Wen [25]

2021

LBBP vs RVSP

65

 

before and 6 months

No difference

No difference

 

Yao [27]

2022

RVSP vs LBBP

50

 

before, 6, 12 and 18 months

Not measured

Higher

GRS

GCS

Zhao [22]

2022

LBBAP with or without RBBB

40

 

1 month

No difference

No difference

LAd

LAVi

RAd

LVEDd

LVESV

LVEDV

LVEF

RVFAC

TAPSE

TV-s’

TMAD

Dyssynchrony measured as difference in peak displacement or systolic time to peak velocity of mitral and tricuspid annuli—shorter in nonRBBB group

Liu [34]

2021

RVOP vs LBBP

84

BNP, QRS duration, interval, amplitude

Before, 7 days

No difference

Not measured

LAd

e’

E wave

A wave

E/A

E/e’

LAEF

LVEF

VTI

LA strain

Xie [35]

2021

RVAP, RVOP, HBP, LBBP

21

 

acute changes

Stable

Stable in LBBP

Yu index—shorter in LBBP than RVAP

PSD—significantly increased in RVAP, shorter in LBBP than RVAP

LVEF

IVMD—significantly increased in RVAP

LVEDD

LVEDV

LVESD

TAPSE

Liu [36]

2021

CRT vs LBBP

62

QRS

3 and 6 months after implantation

  

IVMD, PSD—greater improvement in LBBAP than BVP

Mirolo [37]

2023

LBBAP

134 (47 LBBB; 38 RBBB, the rest—narrow QRS)

QRS duration, the QRS axis, V6 RWPT, the R/Q ratio in V1

X

Not measured

Not measured

IVMD—decrease in LBBB and RBBB group

LVMDT—decrease only in LBBB group

  1. In the table were only indicated values and differences that are statistically significant
  2. 3D-SD Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking, 3D-TD Three-Dimensional Tissue Doppler, BiVP Biventricular pacing; BNP  B-type natriuretic peptide, CRT Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, CSP Conduction System Pacing, GCS Global Circumferential Strain, GLS Global Longitudinal Strain, GLPS Global Longitudinal Peak Strain, GRS Global Radial Strain, HBP His Bundle Pacing, IVMD Interventricular Mechanical Delay, LAEF Left atrial ejection fraction, LBBAP Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, LBBP  Left Bundle Branch Pacing, Tε-dif absolute max difference of time to peak strain; LVAT Left venctricular activation time, LVEDD  Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter, LVEDV Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume, LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction, LVMDT mean of the three dispersion times (from the first to the latest) assessed in each of the three views LVS Left Ventricular Stroke Volume, MR Mitral Regurgitation, NTproBNP N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, PSD Peak systolic dispersion, RVP Right Ventricular Pacing, RAd Right Atrial Diameter, RVAP Right Ventricular Apical Pacing, RVFAC Right Ventricular Fractional Area Change, RVOP Right Ventricular Outflow Pacing, RVSP Right Ventricular Septal Pacing, SDI Systolic dyssynchrony index, TAPSE Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion, TDI Tissue Doppler Imaging, TMAD Tissue Mitral Annular Displacement, TMSV 16-SD (R-R%) standard deviation of time from the QRS starting point to the minimum systolic volume of 16 LV segments, TV-s' Tricuspid Valve S' Wave, VTI Velocity time integral