Skip to main content

Diagnostic characteristics of multimodality imaging for left ventricular lipoma: new insights on surgical intervention

Abstract

Background

The echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality in detecting the cardiac lipoma. Contrast-enhanced echocardiography improves its structural definition and characteristics of blood supply to exclude thrombus and malignant tumors.

Case presentation

We introduced a case that large cardiac mass involving nearly the whole left ventricular cavity and papillary muscles without any complications. Multimodal imaging has confirmed lipoma before surgery. However, rather than recommending conservative treatment in accordance with guidelines, surgical intervention was performed to prevent future hemodynamic abnormalities.

Conclusion

Combined with multimodal imaging, we showed a rare case on comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular silent lipoma and provided new clues for surgical strategy, which were different from guideline recommendations.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Lipoma is the second most common primary benign cardiac neoplasm (8% to 12%) and has been mostly discovered incidentally because it is often asymptomatic [1]. Current guidelines recommend conservative treatment. However, this case still underwent surgical resection, which gives some new enlightenment for its future treatment strategies.

Case report

A 32-year-old man was found incidentally to have left ventricular (LV) occupancy during preoperative examination for kidney stones in local hospital. His medical history and physical examination were unremarkable. Twelve-lead surface ECG revealed no abnormal findings. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on admission revealed two irregular hyperechoic masses at different locations of LV. The one (M1: Fig. 1A1 red arrow, Movie I in the Data Supplement) was attached to basal segment of the LV inferoseptal walls, 4.6 × 1.8 cm in size and 3.9 cm in base. The superior margin of the attachment was approximately 0.3 cm from the annulus of the anterior mitral leaflet. The other one (M2: Fig. 1A2 white arrow, Movie II in the Data Supplement), appeared to have punctate hyperechoic microcalcifications, was attached to middle and apical segments of the LV inferolateral and inferior walls, 3.9 × 3.6 cm in size and 3.5 cm in base. Color Doppler imaging revealed no obstruction in left ventricular inflow tract, outflow tract and lumen. To further clarify the nature of the mass, LV contrast echocardiography was performed. Left ventricular opacification (LVO) showed no contrast agent filling in above mass (Fig. 1B1-2, Movie III in the Data Supplement). Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was performed. A total of 2.5 ml of Sono Vue contrast agent was injected through the left cubital vein at a constant rate for 2 min, and the tube was flushed with 3 ml normal saline. The right and left heart were developed in turn. It displayed that there was slight enhancement of the contrast agent at the base of masses, indicating an unclear boundary with the myocardium (Fig. 1C1-2, Movie IV in the Data Supplement). These findings taken together led us to making a diagnosis of lipoma of LV. MRI exhibited homogeneous signals similar to fat in all pulse sequences (Fig. 1D1-2). 18F-FDG Positron emission tomography demonstrated no obvious metabolic uptake (Fig. 1E1-2). All imaging findings confirmed the presence of the mass, corresponding with the results of echocardiography.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Multimodal imaging and pathological finding. Non-standard view in transthoracic echocardiography showing multiple homogeneous, abroad-base, immobile masses (M1: red arrow and M2: white arrow) in left ventricular (A). Contrast echocardiography displaying no contrast agent filling in above mass and slight enhancement of the contrast agent at the base of masses, indicating an unclear boundary with the myocardium (B and C). Cardiac MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT performing the presence of mass in left ventricular (D and E). Surgical and pathology findings demonstrating the accuracy of imaging diagnosis and the necessity of prophylactic resection (F and G)

Considering the large-diameter mass in LV invaded important anatomical structures, the patient underwent surgery to prevent potentially life-threatening complications. To avoid intraoperative heart injury, a small incision in the aortic (Fig. 1F1) was taken to resect most of soft tissue adherent to the interventricular septum (Fig. 1F2-3) and papillary muscles, so as to reduce the possibility of hemodynamic abnormalities in mitral valve orifice, left ventricular outflow and inflow tract. However, it was impossible to remove the entire tumor, because it was integrated with and partly immersed in the interventricular septum by MCE. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography showed a residual slightly hyperechoic mass near apical segment of LV inferolateral walls, which real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography offered complementary vivid data (Fig. 1G1-4, Movie V in the Data Supplement). The post-operative pathology also ratified all the previous examination findings, characterized by mature adipose tissue with no evidence of malignancy or infiltration (Fig. 1F4).

Discussion

Such large cardiac lipomas involving nearly the whole left ventricular cavity and papillary muscles without any complications are rare. It may grow and cause symptoms or complications such as malignant arrhythmia, outflow tract obstruction, or left ventricular aneurysm, and surgical resection was necessary to prevent its adverse prognosis and even sudden death. Especially for ventricular lipoma, failure of complete resection and post-operative ventricular arrhythmia are correlated with post-operative mortality [2, 3]. We provide new clues for surgical strategies, which were different from the guideline-recommended conservative management for silent lipoma given their benign nature.However, these lipomas may grow over time and lead to complications. Our case highlight the potential risks of leaving such lipomas untreated, especially when they involve critical cardiac structures such as the LV cavity and papillary muscles. Due to malignant arrhythmias caused by the mass’s proximity to electric conduction pathways. The mass impinging on ventricular outflow areas will result outflow tract obstruction. Progressive mechanical or compressive effects on the myocardium and surrounding structures will induce left ventricular aneurysm or structural compromise. The patient in our case presented with a large lipoma involving the majority of the LV cavity and papillary muscles, which has rarely been reported without complications. Given the tumor's potential to grow and lead to malignant arrhythmias or outflow obstruction, surgical resection was deemed necessary to prevent adverse outcomes or sudden cardiac death. Hence we provided proactive intervention to prevent late complications and reduce long-term mortality.

TTE is the first-line imaging modality in detecting the cardiac mass [4]. The contrast echocardiography provides real-time assessment of vascularity and perfusion patterns within cardiac masses, which is critical for differentiating benign from malignant lesions [5]. Malignant tumors often exhibit higher vascularity and irregular perfusion, while benign masses, such as myxomas or thrombi, typically display lower or absent perfusion. The ability of it to characterize blood flow in real-time provides unique insights that MRI and PET may not capture, especially in situations requiring immediate intraoperative or bedside evaluation. Furthermore, contrast echocardiography offers the advantage of being a low-cost, non-invasive method that avoids ionizing radiation, making it suitable for patients with contraindications to other imaging modalities, such as impaired renal function (a contraindication for contrast-enhanced MRI) [6, 7]. In our case, slight enhancement of the contrast agent at the base of masses was clearly seen, consistent with the histological characteristics of lipoma with unclear demarcation between the mass and myocardium. In addition, three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) has an emerging role in the evaluation of cardiac masses. It provides volumetric datasets of cardiac structures, allowing more precise localization, measurement, and spatial characterization of mass morphology compared to two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE). The incremental value of 3DE lies in its ability to generate detailed 3D surface maps of masses, which may assist in determining the relationship of the mass to surrounding structures, guide surgical planning, and facilitate intraoperative imaging [8]. Therefore, we initially eliminate the possible diagnosis of other types of cardiac benign tumors. In addition, this was the classical and comprehensive evaluation by multimodal imaging such as cardiac MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT, especially providing further details of the soft tissue features, which improved the diagnostic confidence by contrast echocardiography [9]. Furthermore, the contrast echocardiography helps differentiate residual tumor from postoperative thrombus or scars. Residual tumor tissue typically shows contrast enhancement due to its vascularity, whereas thrombotic or avascular tissue does not uptake contrast. It is particularly valuable in detecting early tumor recurrence during follow-up, since neovasculature within recurrent tumors leads to contrast enhancement [6, 10, 11].

This case highlights that multimodal imaging plays a key role in accurate characterization of LV silent lipoma and displays indispensable value for surgical perioperative strategies, dynamic monitoring and postoperative follow-up.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

LV:

Left ventricular

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

LVO:

Left ventricular opacification

MCE:

Myocardial contrast echocardiography

References

  1. Tyebally S, Chen D, Bhattacharyya S, Mughrabi A, Hussain Z, Manisty C, Westwood M, Ghosh AK, Guha A. Cardiac tumors: JACC cardiooncology state-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2(2):293–311. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Elbardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Mullany CJ, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, et al. Survival after resection of primary cardiac tumors: a 48-year experience. Circulation. 2008;118(Suppl):S7–15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.783126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Li L, Meng J, Zhou X, Liu C, Guo H, Fan H. Surgical treatment of cardiac lipoma: 20 years’ experience in a single center. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023;136(5):565–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang L, He L, Chen Y, Xie M, Wang J. Infiltrating lipoma of the right ventricle involving the interventricular septum and tricuspid valve: report of a rare case and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95: e2561. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/MD.0000000000002561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rind IA, Bhattacharyya S. Usefulness of contrast enhanced cardiac ultrasound to assess vascularity in cardiac mass of unknown aetiology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;24(1):e22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ehjci/jeac209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Senior R, Becher H, Monaghan M, et al. Contrast echocardiography: evidence-based recommendations by European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(11):1205–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ehjci/jex182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkpatrick JN, Lang RM, Belohlavek M, et al. ASE recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: a guideline from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyebally S, Chen D, Bhattacharyya S, et al. Cardiac tumors: JACC cardiooncology state-of-the-art review. JACC CardioOncol. 2020;2(2):293–311. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.05.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimaldi A, et al. Lipoma at the right atrioventricular groove. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12(9):711. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ejechocard/jer098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulvagh SL, Rakowski H, Vannan MA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography consensus statement on the clinical applications of ultrasonic contrast agents in echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(11):1179–201. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, Kasprzak JD, et al. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by myocardial contrast echocardiography in comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(22):2402–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors are from Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82302227 and 82171961).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tianshu Liu and Lingyun Fang made contributions to the data analysis and manuscript preparation. Jiawei Shi, Lin He and Jing Zhang contributed to the conceptualization and experimental design.Yuman Li, Mingxing Xie and Jing Wang participated in the revision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuman Li, Mingxing Xie or Jing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for retrospective analyses of records and imaging data was waived. This work adheres to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The need for signed patient consent was waived.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, T., Fang, L., Shi, J. et al. Diagnostic characteristics of multimodality imaging for left ventricular lipoma: new insights on surgical intervention. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 23, 11 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12947-025-00346-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12947-025-00346-2

Keywords